28 September
2012
What
happened to yesterday's entry? Well, I
totally forgot about it in the morning, then we went out for a few hours and
then I forgot again. Now real reason
though ... just plain forgot. A senior
moment eh ;-)))
So, that
teacher and his 15 year old girlfriend have been found in France. I wonder what he can be charged with
though? Child abduction, yes, but what
else? Will there be any evidence of
sexual assault? I doubt it; and in any
case if the girl doesn't make a compliant then how can they charge him with
it. She's 15 now, but what is the
difference between now and her 16th birthday?
It's just a line of text in then Law isn't it? But why would a 16 year old be expected to be
better informed in this area than a 15 year old?
I agree that there has to be line in the sand somewhere but
just because has reached that line doesn't mean they are mature enough to make
informed choices. We all mature at times
and in different ways. The Law as it now
stands doesn't take any notice of that.
The LAW says ... and that's it.
But even so I've known of case here in Dorktown where 14 and 15 year old
girls wouldn't make complaints about someone because they claimed they were in
love with the men involved. And thinking
of maturity, I know one man who is not only mentally ill but he is also termed
as having 'learning difficulties'. This
man has never had a girl friend and the odd time the subject of marriage and
sex has cropped up in our conversations, he just shakes his head and says he
doesn't understand it. This man is older
than me, and I'm 64 next month. So the
whole subject can fraught with difficulty.
I was reading something in one of the weekend papers one
time - can't remember which or when - and it was claimed in that the number of
children who are losing their virginity between the ages of 12 and 14 is on the
increase. If they lose it to an adult
then an offence has been committed. But
what if two 14 year olds decided to give it a go? Both are under the age of consent, so which
one is charged? Can both be charged? Indeed, what can they be charged with?
I'll leave you to decide!
Here is today's photo that I got in Cambridge some time ago
...
I think this is one of my better shots.
Funny time ...
A British Navy Admiral was attending a Naval conference that
included admirals from the U.S., British, Canadian, Australian and French
Navies. At a cocktail reception, he
found himself standing with a group of half dozen or so officers that included
personnel from most of the countries.
Everyone was chatting away in English as they sipped their drinks but a French admiral suddenly complained that, whereas Europeans learn many languages, Americans learn only English. He then asked: "Why is it that we always have to speak English in these conferences rather than speaking French?"
Without hesitating, the British Admiral replied: "Maybe it's because the Brits, Canadians, Aussies and Americans arranged it so you wouldn't have to speak f**king German."
Suddenly the group became very quiet.
Everyone was chatting away in English as they sipped their drinks but a French admiral suddenly complained that, whereas Europeans learn many languages, Americans learn only English. He then asked: "Why is it that we always have to speak English in these conferences rather than speaking French?"
Without hesitating, the British Admiral replied: "Maybe it's because the Brits, Canadians, Aussies and Americans arranged it so you wouldn't have to speak f**king German."
Suddenly the group became very quiet.
No comments:
Post a Comment